Beta Registration

The CEO game introduction

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

Your Country

Additional notes

Enter the text in the image

captcha

On Facebook

The CEO Game on Facebook

RSS and Twitter

  • 04Dec

    This article defines and discusses the meaning of monopoly and tries to explain how one company can control all of the market. It will then discuss whether a monopoly is good or bad and for who?

    So, what the hell is a monopoly? Well monopoly is a generic name for a company or individual that controls most or all of the supply of a product or services. This means that it can control the price of a product, and if a company can control the price of the product then it can easily maximize its revenue. In other words, the monopoly takes advantage of its special ability of setting the price and by doing so the customers and other small competitors are hurt by this.

    More Than Just a Game

    More Than Just a Game

    So how can a company reach the status of monopoly? Well, some companies can guard their product or service through things such as a patents or trademarks. These are very reliable tools to guard a unique product. If you have a product with a patent you automatically become a monopoly because you are the only one that can sell or manufacture it, but it’s very hard to create a product that have sufficient demand in the market and yet has a unique quality such as innovation in its manufacturing process or in the makeup of the product itself. A company can also get big enough and become a leading force in the market. It can also be that the market is too small and the first company takes over all the market. Sometimes a company can be so good in the manufacturing process or have such a uniquely professional work force that it can eliminate competition, but that’s highly unlikely. In some rare cases a country can give a company monopoly rights.

    Sometimes giving patent rights can do much harm to the public and even raise ethical questions. For example, every year the pharmaceuticals industry invents lots of new medicine under patents and that’s way those companies sell them in such high prices. This medicine can be a life-saving yet the poor can’t get it because it is too expensive. But if the product didn’t have the protection of a patent and instead was a commodity in the free market, many more lives would be saved.

    In conclusion, a monopoly is bad for consumers and very good for the monopoly. Sometimes monopoly status can lead to unfair consequences. In one side of the market economy there is perfect competition, which means that the consumers enjoy the lowest prices possible. On the other hand, there is the monopoly, which means that the one company sets the price and gains maximum revenue at the expense of the costumers.

    While playing the CEO game, you will get a unique chance to compete against leading monopolies and even trying your own monopoly.

    Omri.

    The CEO Game.

    VN:F [1.8.6_1065]
    Rating: 7.2/10 (6 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.8.6_1065]
    Rating: +5 (from 5 votes)
    Share

    Tags: , , ,

  • 29Nov

    In an Op-Ed in the Washington Post online today (Sunday), Ben Bernanke stepped up as a public figure and a politician to inform other public figures and politicians about the havoc the proposed legislation to reform the Fed would have on the United States’ economy. The difference between Bernanke and his audience? Apparently, none of them had even taken Econ 101.

    Will They Listen?

    Will They Listen?

    It is basic economic fact–in a field with very little facts and very many theories–that an independent Federal Reserve that dictates monetary supply is a major reason why the Unites currency is trustworthy. It has been proven, as Bernanke said himself, that central banks that have the power to make monetary policy independently of political influence lead to lower inflation and interest rates. This is because the bank can be trusted not to simply print more money to inflate the country out of date or shift its interest rate to suit whatever party is in power. An independent Fed leaves the politics to the politicians and the economy to the economists. And so, the economy performs best.

    It’s not that there’s not room for improvement in the Fed’s regulation of banks, as the crisis has clearly shown. And it’s not that there’s not room for greater transparency in the Fed, or to remove some of its responsibilities, such as creating a new agency to take over the Fed’s consumer lending issues, as Bernanke has already agreed to. But the proposals to remove the rule of the central bank regulatory powers or to audit monetary policy deliberations and actions make absolutely no economic sense. They make political sense, because people are angry and they want to see heads roll. This is exactly why the Fed needs to be sheltered from the whims of the masses and their representatives.

    What I want to know is how so many people have taken seriously the economic proposals of a man who wants to return to the Gold Standard? Why don’t our politicians wake up? In the past 30 years there has been a worldwide movement towards erecting independent central banks. This movement has been accompanied by economic improvement, most notable inflation stability. Creating independent central banks was one of the main ways that Latin American countries curbed the hyperinflation that tortured them for so many years, for instance. Are we really going to take a step backwards? We could add tying the Fed to political whims to the list of uniquely American disgraces, such as not signing the Kyoto Protocol or the UN Convention on the Rights of the charter.

    Tamar.

    The CEO Game.

    VN:F [1.8.6_1065]
    Rating: 9.7/10 (3 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.8.6_1065]
    Rating: +2 (from 4 votes)
    Share

    Tags: , , , ,

  • 22Oct

    Inorder to succeed in the CEO Game you need to apply real life strategies.

    For instance, in the real business world, in order to earn more than normal profit (which is zero) you need to do something better than the other competitors. Otherwise, you’ll simply maintain your position, instead of earning a real profit.


    Price Wars- Who Will Win?

    Price Wars- Who Will Win?

    It is easy to describe this problem in a simplified economy. There are two stores selling the same products in the same place to the same customers, who have complete information on the store prices and there is no additional cost to produce aside the cost of the product itself. So people will go from one store to the other to bargain until they get the minimum price of one store. If the product has the same manufacturing cost to both stores, the stores will end up selling their products in the same price. Their profit will be normal profit rate, a little higher than the interest rate.


    How do you get to a normal profit rate?

    Well, if you don’t have anything unusual like a unique product or services, trademark, patent or even knowledge that you’re other competitors don’t have, eventually you’ll get to normal profit rate. Because if you are selling a commodity and if your store is in a certain region that makes lots of money by selling a product that every one of your competitors can sell at the same price, they will. So they will start to sell the same commodity in the same profitable region and slowly decrease your profit rate. Eventually, one store will start to lower its prices in order to be more attractive to the customers and that will lower your profit rate of both stores even further. Then you will lower your price and so on and so forth–this is called a “Price war“. The only ones winning here are the customers, while you and your competitors’ loss profit until you reach the normal profit rate.


    How can you avoid a normal profit rate? As mentioned before, you need something that your competitors don’t have, such as a patent on a product or trademark, which your competitors can’t use, and therefore you can charge how much you want because you are the only one that can supply the certain good. Even a source of knowledge can be a barrier to competition, but not as strong as patent or trademark. For example, if you know in what region the demand to your product is the highest you can open the store there and sell it at high prices. But after a while your competitors will find this profitable region and start selling the same product and once again you will have a price war.

    This is just one of the key economic concepts you need to understand to succeed in the business world. In the CEO Game, as a realistic business simulation , these concepts are just as important. Good luck, with setting up your business tycoon!

    Omri.

    The CEO Game.

    VN:F [1.8.6_1065]
    Rating: 9.8/10 (5 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.8.6_1065]
    Rating: +5 (from 5 votes)
    Share

    Tags: , , , , , , ,

  • 10Oct

    The ground is shaking; the world is braking, as we enter a new era.

    The balance of the global economy is fragile and constantly changing, but now we ourselves are on the verge of a major power change. This change is so comprehensive and great that it will affect every aspect of our lives.  I’m talking about the eroding power of the greatest empire of the modern world: the United States of America.

    Losing Money in Iraq

    Losing Money in Iraq

    In this article, we’ll discuss how and why the world is moving in this direction, if it is inevitable or if we can fight to maintain the USA’s position as a spiritual, cultural, and economic leading force and if these changes are for the best or if it is just the dawn of total chaos in the world.

    It’s well known that America has declined in its status as the leading force in the world over the years. The USA is like a sinking ship; the only problem is that in a global world in which we live this ship is tied to all the other ships.

    But what caused the bubble to burst in our face so suddenly one year ago. In my opinion there are several major failures or unwise economic behaviors that brought us to this point, yet, at the time, many of these actions seemed so right

    The first reason is the horrible terror attack of September 11th. This unprecedented event was the trigger to a chain of events such as the change in the paid interest rate direction—it decreased in order to help the market pull out of the economic stress and overcome the uncertainty that followed the September 11th. This greatly damaged the economy because people tend to take more loans when the interest rate is low in order to invest or consume. Because the American tendency is to consume, many people took loans in order to continue buying goods they could not afford.

    The USA is not a leading supplier of goods, because comparative advantage of the USA lies in a highly qualified work force and not in industry products. And so, the USA began to import more and more products from other countries, especially China. This ultimately caused the dollar’s value to drop, especially against the Chinese Yuan.

    On top of this, the USA had to fund the war in Iraq that cost a lot of money and had many logistic and economic problems. In addition, it has to find a way to confront the new terrorism threat, which is also money consuming.

    It seems clear that the age of US economic hegemony is over. The implications for its cultural and political dominance remain unclear. Perhaps the US should look towards former colonial titan Britain as a model—the former empire knows a little bit about how to handle the end of an era.

    Omri.

    The CEO Game.

    VN:F [1.8.6_1065]
    Rating: 9.4/10 (5 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.8.6_1065]
    Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
    Share

    Tags: , , , , , ,

  • 26Sep

    A field that is closely related to behavioral economics and aiding its development is Neuroeconomics. Neuroeconomics uses the insights and methodologies of neuroscience, the study of the brain, in order to deepen our understanding of economics. Neuroscience has both been able to augment some of the traditional assumptions of classical economics (termed the “incremental approach”) and to force economics to completely rethink classical economic constructs (termed the “radical approach”). Classical economics evolved based on a system of revealed preferences — the idea that people’s preferences can indicated correctly through their actions, such as through their purchases. Now that a neuroscience technique allows measurement of actual thoughts and feelings, the link between feelings and actions is being broken down.

    Understanding The Brain.

    Understanding The Brain.

    What neuroscience doing, perhaps most importantly, is illuminating the difference between controlled and automatic responses and between the affective and cognitive systems. Classical economics mostly deals with controlled responses and the cognitive system. It presumes that people always can and do fully take the time to weigh all of their options, think of all of the ramifications, and pick the option that maximizes their utility. Some responses, however, are automatic. People have little control over these processes and even very little introspective access. Therefore, the usual utility-maximizing behavior cannot apply. Furthermore, some responses, whether or not there are automatic, are drive by the affective system. This includes not only emotions, but also drives, such as arousal, pain, and craving.

    What tools does Neuroeconomics employ? Firstly, Neuroeconomics employs neural imaging techniques, such as MRIs, PET scans, and EEGs. But the field has a number of other tools at its disposal, including single-neuron imaging (used only on animals, thus far), electrical brain stimulation (EBS), the examination of brain damage and its effect on humans, Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and the monitoring of physiological indicators.

    The use of neuroscience techniques to inform economics is Neuroeconomics. So what have these techniques told economists? Firstly, it challenges many of the basic constructs we now use, such as risk aversion and time preferences. For instance, classical economics assumes that people have consistent discount rates across different activities. However, neuroscience shows us that different parts of the brain are used when contemplating or doing different activities. Thus, the discounting involved overeating may be completely different than the discounting involved in properly storing your shoes. Secondly, brain scans suggest that people react similarly to the gain or loss of money as do the gain or loss of food. This implies that money itself has utility, as opposed to being an indirect measure of utility as something than can be used to obtain other things. Thirdly, the distinction in the brain between pleasure and motivation system shows that people do not always pursue the most that is that they want the most, which is a basic assumption of classical economic theory. This is just a sampling of the findings of neuroeconomics.

    The implications of neuroeconomics are staggering. With the brain more accessible than ever before, assumptions that were made before economics could know how people thought have to be rethought. Though it is too early to tell exactly how and if economics will integrate this field, it is certainly promising to change the way many of us think.

    Tamar.

    The CEO Game.

    VN:F [1.8.6_1065]
    Rating: 9.6/10 (5 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.8.6_1065]
    Rating: +5 (from 5 votes)
    Share

    Tags: , , , , , ,

  • 24Sep
    G20 - Pittsburg Summit 2009

    G20 - Pittsburg Summit 2009

    Now it is happening, all eyes are on Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania the host of the two-day long, tens of millions of dollars staging costs ,G-20 Summit; With President Obama chairing the event and welcoming the guests, nothing less is expected than a mega media fiasco. Leaders and important personal will come a-knocking from countries all around the world that constitute together eighty five percent of the world’s economy. At the summit, all aspects of the progress made since the Washington and London Summits will be reviewed and the leaders will discuss more actions regarding sustaining the ongoing recovery from the global economic and financial crisis. This article looks at what should we expect.

    The central debate is going to revolve around reforming the way the world economy is governed and the obvious follow-up question: who should run the global economy. Furthermore, another main issue to be discussed by the G-20 members is placing limits on bankers’ bonuses worldwide. But what is the G-20 actually? The G-20, The Group of Twenty, to give it its full title, was formally set up in 1999 as a result of the Asian financial crisis, in order to bring together major finance ministers and bankers from industrialized and developing economies to discuss the hot issues in the world economy. Among the desirable members you can find: Australia, China, France, Germany, India, Saudi Arabia ,Russia, the United Kingdom, the USA as well as the European Union itself and more, and they are usually joined by representatives from widely renowned institutions such as the World Bank, World Trade Organization and the International Monetary Fund.

    Last year, the frightening ongoing recession pushed G-20 officials to hold the first summit that had primary heads of state as guests in the Washington summit, when the leaders agreed on an action plan that included issues such as promoting integrity in the markets, strengthening worldwide cooperation, reforming international economic institutions and more. The theme in the April 2009 summit in London was similar: dealing with the crisis. In London the leaders continued to work on the previously made resolutions and agreed upon six pledges centering on restoring confidence, repairing the financial system, restoring financial regulation, preventing future crises by building up international institutions, promoting global trade and building a stable, green recovery. Altogether, the counterparts pledged they would spend an astronomical five trillion dollars on efforts to salvage their economies and another trillion dollars to help out struggling nations. In London the leaders also requested another convention to be held before the end of the year; Obama enthusiastically agreed to entertain and chose Pittsburgh for the setting.

    Thus, why Pittsburgh? Officials like to say the city of bridges was chosen because of the remarkable transformation it made from a grimy old steel industry to high-tech innovation including green and clean development over the years, a positive change that Obama surely wants to showcase. “Pittsburgh stands as a bold example of how to create new jobs and industries while transitioning to a 21st century economy” he has said. Pittsburgh is a perfect spot to show off local green achievements made this year such as the revival of “East Penn Manufacturing”, the city’s medical laboratories, and transformed industrial plants that went hybrid. Yet the proximity to New York is kind of comfy since many of the attendees must attend the UN General Assembly as well and the fact that, well let’s face it, Pittsburgh is important for the second cadence also must be taken into account. A great deal of thought was also made in selecting the convention center itself, the David L. Lawrence center, the world’s first green convention center.

    Another question to be asked is did they do what they promised? At this time, the picture isn’t clear enough to say, but much of the dough promised to struggling countries has been transferred to them. However, there still remains a lot of work ahead with complex issues like who is going to be running the global economy and regulation of banks and hedge funds as mentioned before.

    More importantly, what should we expect from the Pittsburgh Summit? Since many prime economies are slowly recovering from the recession, there is no need (nor could it be fulfilled) for another round of big spending pledges, instead the summit will concentrate on the ones its members already committed to. The center stage will focus on regulation and reform, with the topic of the day being dealing with banker’s bonuses; there is a good chance to see an agreement on that.  Another hot item, is making sure that all countries are on the same page and don’t mess around with staggering companies. Will India and China be presented better in the International Monetary Fund? The IMF, The UN’s agency that facilitates international commerce and aids developing countries, will also be under discussion. Obama also claimed that we must stay clear of the asset bubbles by setting up a path for “sustainable growth while steering clear of the imbalances of the past”. Hence that’s going to be a key part of the agenda as well. Although the recovery is in progress, the fact that many people are still unemployed, should and probably will be a noticeable subject.

    In conclusion, as financial crises fear no international boundaries, these meetings offer an opportunity to discuss economic problems and maybe even agree on the appropriate actions that need to be taken in response. As the conductors of the world’s largest economies, these leaders have a responsibility to work together in order to insure this kind of crisis won’t happen again. “The Pittsburgh Summit is an important opportunity to continue the hard work that we have done in confronting the global economic crisis, and renewing prosperity for our people”, said Obama on the eve of the summit’s jumpstart. Prior to Obama’s election, critics said that after the campaign ends, Obama will be tested by major-hard-to-cope-with events and by his reactions to them. Now it’s up to him and his administration to deal with the crisis in order to prove themselves. Now is the time to see whether the Pittsburgh Summit will be remembered as an important milestone or a complete disaster in terms of financial pace making and use of the tax payer’s cash. Will it be a prestigious achievement, one that may prove that Obama’s administration is better than his predecessor’s Or will the summit be just another brick in the wall of history?

    Omer Shachnai

    The CEO Game.

    VN:F [1.8.6_1065]
    Rating: 9.8/10 (6 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.8.6_1065]
    Rating: +5 (from 5 votes)
    Share

    Tags: , , , , , ,

  • 19Sep

    My last series of articles introduced basic methods for becoming a smart, safe and profitable investor or a trader. The objective is to use these strategies before even beginning to invest. In response to my article, I received an email from a good friend of mine who said that he sees himself as an “entrepreneur,” not as an investor.

    Investor Or Entrepreneur ?

    Investor Or Entrepreneur ?

    This article will clarify the differences between an investor and an entrepreneur and explain why the entrepreneur needs to understand the investor`s mind in order to succeed in the business world.

    As I previously explained, the investor is constantly seeking value and looking for upsides in long-term investments. Who is going to provide those things to the investor? The entrepreneur, whose job is to create this value for the investors.

    An entrepreneur, contrary to an investor, is creating value. There are many ways to create value: It can be done by bringing something new to the world or by improving others` work. For investors, the investment in a new business or startup has the highest return but also the highest risk (they always go side by side); the returns can be 10 times your money and more, but often you`ll lose most or even all of your investment.

    Why does the entrepreneur need to understand the investor`s mind?

    In order to succeed as an entrepreneur and bring your idea to the world, you need to have funds. There are several ways to acquire those funds:

    • Use your own money and savings.
    • Get a loan from a bank or a lending company.
    • Take a first or second mortgage on your house (similar to a loan except a mortgage is usually fully collateralized – easier to acquire than a regular loan).
    • Get private or institutional investors to invest in your company`s future profits by selling them a percentage of the company.

    The last option is the one which most entrepreneurs would rather resort to, because they are risking someone else`s money, Because of the appeal of this option, the entrepreneur must wear many different hats and change his way of thinking – if you`ll be able to think like an investor it will be much easier for you to convince investors to invest in you.

    How can you get others to invest in you?

    Investors see many ideas every day but are looking for opportunities that have the most chance to create long-term profits. As an entrepreneur, you need to understand how the investor thinks and makes decisions in order to convince him/her to invest in your idea.

    You`ll do so by understanding and thinking like an investor. Investors are interested in one thing – making money. Smart investors must invest in a diversity of projects or ideas with different risk factors. In this way they level out the risks and maximize their odds for a profit. The expected profits should be higher than returns on the safest form of investment, government treasuries bond. If it is not so the investor will invest in treasuries.

    When you talk with an investor, make sure you show the person how he will make money out of your idea, not how this idea will change the world. Changing the world is nice, being part of it is even nicer, but this is a different game. Investors are there to make money and by doing so they help you make money as well. It`s extremely important to remember that both sides need to end up winning. Make it a win-win situation.

    The problem most people have when they meet potential investors is that they haven’t prepared financial plans, haven`t shown the cost of the development process, how long the process will take, what is the potential selling price, etc. The financial plans are as important as the idea itself. Showing the investor a good and profitable plan will maximize your chances to attract the investors.

    How can the CEO game help you?

    In the CEO Game, you will experience running a business, putting your ideas into action and attracting others to invest in your project. In the game you`ll play from both sides – the investor and the entrepreneur.

    Assaf Arie

    The CEO Game.

    VN:F [1.8.6_1065]
    Rating: 9.8/10 (6 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.8.6_1065]
    Rating: +6 (from 6 votes)
    Share

    Tags: , , ,

  • 08Sep

    At part 1, I talked about the three questions you need to ask yourself before you invest money in the stock market. In this article, and the next one, I will talk about your definition as an investor or a trader. It is extremely important to know and understand the difference between them, and to put your self under the right title. Not everyone has what is needed in order to be an investor or a trader; a one person can be a great investor but a terrible trader, or the other way around.
    In this article I will talk about investors, and how the answers for three questions need to take place in your investing strategy.

    What is an investor?
    An investor is someone who looks for value, he cares about the company, he needs to know what the company does, he needs to understand the main business of the company and how the market is changing, he also needs to know how changes in the global market effects this company. An investor needs to have some kind of valuation to the price of the company, according to the business it is operating in (different businesses demands different valuations theories). A good example, or maybe even the best example of an investor, is Warren Buffett; you can read more about him at Wikipedia.

    Warren Buffett - Best Example of an Investor

    Warren Buffett - Best Example of an Investor

    The three questions that needed to be answered are the same from part one of this article:
    1. What are you buying?
    2. Why are you buying?
    3. When are you selling?

    What are you buying? – The answer to this is the same as specified in part one

    Why are you buying? – As we said in part one, this is where the hard work starts. In an investor’s view, he needs to find value in the stock, so what does it mean? It means that he needs to do a valuation to the company and compare it to the market value; the difference between different companies will be the value. When your valuation is higher than the market value you say that there is an upside in the stock, when your valuation is lower you say there is a downside in the stock. After you find a stock with an upside that you think is good enough for you and you decide to buy, it`s not enough to buy and wait till it reaches your target, you need, every reasonable period of time, which changes from business to business, to update your target price according to the changes in the businesses market. This is not a simple task; you need to have a lot of knowledge and information about your company and its market.

    When are you selling? – Here you have two choices:
    1. Having a stop loss
    2. Not having a stop loss
    Before I will continue I will define the meaning of stop loss for you – a stop loss, as you can understand from the name, is a point you stop your loss automatically. For example, if you buy a stock for 10$ a share, and the maximum loss you are willing to absorb is 15%, then your stop loss will be placed at 8.5$, means that if the stock drop to 8.5$ or less, it`s automatically being sold.
    I think that if you are considering yourself as an investor, and you know and understand what is that you are doing, you don’t need to have a stop loss, but you need to remember that investing can take couple of hours to study, but life time to master. Also, investors are long term players; you can not consider yourself an investor if you are a short term player, because economic theories work only at the long term.
    A good use of stop loss is when changes appear in the market or the company after the stock price had slumped. The last crisis we were going thru is a good example of that, but even then – a good investor, that is looking at the market as one big piece, could see, and needed to see, the distortion in the market prices, and could expect the globally slump.
    Regardless to having a stop loss or not, you need to constantly analyze the company you are investing in, the market of this company and the global market. Always remember that in the real economy it’s all about mutual influences (I will talk more about it in future articles).

    So, are you an investor?
    Like everything else in life, it’s all starting with a decision. Not everyone can be an investor, remember that if you put money in a company, it doesn’t necessarily make you an investor – it only makes you to someone who invest money in the company or bought their stock, nothing more than that.
    In the 3rd part of the article, I will discuss a little bit about traders and trading.

    Assaf Arie

    The CEO Game.

    VN:F [1.8.6_1065]
    Rating: 9.6/10 (11 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.8.6_1065]
    Rating: +10 (from 10 votes)
    Share

    Tags: , , ,

« Previous Entries   

Recent Comments

  • While we are dealing with items within the vicinity of Are t...
  • I think they should still make them games there is no usa la...
  • how do i register ?? where is the option ?>...
  • Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted ...
  • when start beta?...